
Activity
9.5
Member Ratingbased on 83 ratings
11.4K
7
THE HIGHEST QUALITY OF EXCLUSIVE CONTENT
Access All Galleries InstantlyGet Full Site AccessAlso available
Download at $2.99- Don't Miss OutReceive the Weekly Top 10 Models directly to your inbox. You'll also get exclusive deals only available through our newsletters.
- Amazing Content
- Become Affiliated
- Account & Services
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement.
Warning - This site contains adult material of a sexual nature - you must be of legal age in your area to view this material.
All materials on ALSScan.com, are copyright © 2025 ALSScan.com. All models were at least 18 years of age when photographed.
Epoch is an authorized sales agent, their billing support may be found at Epoch.com.
Segpay Billing Support can be accessed here: Segpay Consumer Portal.
3.6.1 4cf3f5
7 Members commented on Dori's gallery
Dori's slight camel toe is wonderful.
alles was man sich wuenscht, ein traumkoerper, geiler traum
I've never understood why the remastered sets consistently get low scores. I remember Dori from many years ago. I loved her tight little slit on the swing. Still do.
Me neither. ALSscan would not be ALSscan without it. I am grateful for every remaster being made, as the classic ALSscan scenes are the heart and soul of it all.
I clicked on the "remastered" tag to see what sort of ratings the sets have been getting. It looks like when you click on a tag, you get a page of results with the ratings still on the 5 point scale. If you then click on a set, it comes up with a 10 point scale. That happened for all the tags I checked. So it looks like the conversion to 10 point ratings is not yet complete.
Thanks for the info. I was away for awhile due to medical issues. When I came back this whole new format. Do you know when and why?
Glad to see you are back. The site change has been a few months now. No, Alex and Eric have not said anything about why it happened. My best guess is it must have been more or less forced on them by Metart since the old site was pretty stable with few (visible anyway) problems. I think it would be pretty crazy to voluntarily throw away a functional website when you only have a limited IT budget. Eric has been working hard, but as you would expect, it's been very buggy. There were also changes I didn't like to several features, so I've been complaining vastly more than I ever used to. It is slowly getting better, but it is a shame to have spent that much time and effort just to build a new site that is not yet as good as the old one. Anyway, you missed out on the most exasperating period. Once you learn your way around, it's not so bad now and will hopefully still get better.