ALS Scan
Your Pages Recently Viewed
Your Content Recently Viewed

Comments

  • 1

Wow! This was a 10+ for me, and there wasn't even any peeing. What an attractive young lady, with absolutely stellar breasts. The 1st 2 pages of this shoot were, for me, two of the best ever.

Which brings me to another point. There were no toys in this shoot, and I loved it. For me it's not about the insertion of the Rocket, or anything else. It's about the beauty of the model and the teasing. I loved how many pictures were of Dawn's legs crossed, with just the slightest hint of pussy showing.

Awesome set, thanks.

  • 1

Interesting point you touch upon there, Sargon. If it is one thing I think ALSscan maybe has downplayed in recent years, but which was (and I really hope: still is) very much at the heart of things from the start, is a strong focus on the "all shaved" aspect of beautiful young women, back when a woman willing to shave of all her pubic hair and proudly displaying the resulting look was something really special and something of a fetish of it's own (which I, for one, really still think it is). Nobody has done this better than ALSscan, in photographic celebration of well shaved (initially often including the actually shaving), bottomless, full figure as well as closeup, female beauty. Including fun studies of turned on, completely shaved ladies trying out toys for the viewers benefit.

I wouldn't in any way want ALSscan to stop having an indepth focus on toys, but I sometimes miss a more general focus of a woman losing her pubes and very much, in most outrageous ways, putting the resulting look on display.

  • 0

I agree.

  • 2

I really love these remastered scenes of drop dead gorgeous girls like Dawn here, with a vastly increased number of photos included. :)

  • 1

...the statement from Fooly Cooly is dispensable..

  • 2

Thank you Gowirich for your contribution to improving the site.

There has been an occasional discussion on when to list the assistant. Gina Gerson has 11 pages of entries, Blue Angel has 20 pages. Liv has 6 pages. The idea is to make it easier to find the sets that these girls are really in as opposed to just handing over a toy, or, as in this case, sitting with their back to the camera. Obviously not everybody cares. But this is one of the little things that ALS does from time to time to make the site a little better. I'm glad that the ALS crew is interested in making improvements--it's one of the many reasons that ALS is best.

  • 0

I've never understood why Gina is so popular. I rarely give her a high rating

  • 0

If you are still thinking about when to list the female assistant as one of the featured models, I'd suggest this is a set to not include her. While it is true that Liv puts her fist up Dawn's pussy, it's also true that we never see Liv's face. So this scene will be of interest to people wanting to find Dawn, but not for people wanting to find Liv.

  • 0

I´m not sure I agree. I think Liv very much is part of this scene, and thus should be mentioned. Just because she has her back to the camera does not mean she isn´t there.
It might be said that Liv in this case is easily recognizable anyway, but naming who is in any particular scene (not least in order to make everything more searchable) makes it all the more interesting.

Another matter is that it might have been a good idea if the featured-list for each scene made a distinction between main model (or models) and who featured in the role of assistant, as this scene very much is much more all about about Dawn than Liv (as noted by Fooly Cooly).

  • 2

Eric explained once that the MetArt software doesn't have provisions to do that. The assistant has to either be listed or not. Those are the choices.



  • 0

Yes, I understand that this might be a software-related thing, in which case I prefer the way ALSscan include everyone pictured in a scene.

One way to circumvent the limitations, could of course be to differentiate between main model and modelling assistant with some sort of prefix, where you would have both "Liv Wylder" and "(assistant) Liv Wylder" listed as models. Obviously this would be a rather clunky way of doing things, and therefore the current way of just listing everyone "as is" might still be the best.

  • 3

I'd like to identify models hierarchically, eg Featured, Co-Feat, Assist, Appears - one day... :)

  • 2

Yeah, I'd like that too.

  • 1

If you want to "find Liv" go to her page..........It's not rocket science!

18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement

Warning - This site contains adult material of a sexual nature - you must be of legal age in your area to view this material.

All materials on alsscan.com, are copyright © 1996 - 2018 alsscan.com. Payments processed by ECHST.NET

All models were at least 18 years of age when photographed.