Wet Hot American Summer

Yes indeed.

This is fixed

No it's not...

it's exactly the same

It only has 220MB, 111 images.

Please correct as soon as possible, Again.
Thanks

Please try refreshing the page or going to settings and setting the "Download" option to 'Alternate Mirror'. I have refreshed the CDN again, but if you keep having trouble, please email support@alsscan.com

Now the file is fix .

Thanks

Well, the long tradition has been that the "crew" tag is used when we get to see the video camera operator and whoever holds the light. So I would be a bit disappointed with this set being labeled "crew" since it would break with that practice and I do use the tag to find exactly those scenes.

For somebody gaping the model's pussy (or inserting or holding a toy), the traditional tag has been "assistant" (usually female assistant). But that tag is mostly only used when we can see the person's face. Just a pair of arms has not been tagged before.

If it makes any difference to you, I'm pretty sure that those arms belong to Sarah since she does most of the lip pulling or pussy gaping. So you could just consider this a type of girl girl.

But really, can't you just skip over ten shots out of 203? Or do you think that ALS really needs a tag: "anonymous pair of arms"? Sounds excessive to me, but I guess I don't share your phobia.

I get it - you like it. You love it. You want more of that sort of thing. And anytime anybody says something contrary, or even asks about something that helps them avoid something you like, you've seemingly got to take umbrage with it.

I'm here for the models and not the crew, not the assistants and especially not any that happen to be a male.

As far as males go, I seek as male free an experience as absolutely possible.

The number one thing that's wrong with adult entertainment across the board is too many males, overwhelming amounts of B/G. The last thing I want to do is to see more of it.

I'm not asking them to offer any less of it. Keep it steady, just as much as they have been, keep folks that like it happy, it's a regular thing, I get it. You are a long time and valued member, having been here for many many years. It pays to keep folks like that, reoccurring members happy and well fed!

Just the same, I will do my level best to avoid it every single time, hence why I appreciate the tags, if at all possible. Not asking them to give you any less of what you want. I'm only asking for a tool to help me further filter out the content that I don't want to see. That's not unreasonable. If I were asking them to change it, to stop what they're doing, especially as a new member? Yeah, that's asinine and a pipe dream. Just looking for a tag, that's all. A way to filter it so that I know a given set or video is the model and only the model (as otherwise it's a non-view and a non-download).

Yes, those are my arms :)

ahh see Some wanna show us their arms and let us know who :) Thanx ! (course we aren't pressuring the so called crew (I say that cause their comments in the background in bts is as much of the shoot as the person in front of the camera) but not pressuring anyone who don't wanna come out and say who's part is who's :) )

I am happy to add a tag like this going forward as best I understand your meaning. Can you suggest one? I considered 'solo', which has many search results but is not a tag I have officially applied to any update (can not control user tags). Or 'unassisted', so excluding female assistants, but a little vague in meaning if filtering out 'crew' shots. I assume it would apply to nearly all masturbation videos, excluding ones where the cameraman speaks to the model, but not ones where the model speaks to the camera.

Well, if it's to help find content then it would be something like, maybe, an "only-model" tag or something to that effect? If I don't see it, I know to just take a casual gander at the front page (as the non-model bits tend to show up a page or two in for photo sets). However, that would probably wind up being a lot of extra-tagging, those ones seemingly being more frequent than the ones that have some crew or assistants showing up.

If it's to help filter out or avoid, perhaps a "non-model" tag; that would be a big bright heads up. And based off just the preview pics on the first page, if it's a photo set, as the non-model bits tend to show up a few pages in, I could even feel confident in throwing it a high rating too – like Michelle's day before yesterday, easily able to tell just how good that would be overall just from the front page of them (regardless of my preferences on just seeing the models, it's clear both this and the prior photo set are very high quality offerings, there's simply no denying that!). That'd be great. Furthermore it'd be less tagging overall for you all to do, as the "non-model" tag needed uploads are far fewer than if an "only-model" tag was opted for.

Either work effectively for me. Or something similar, or something you all come up with that works to the same effect, but just as important, doesn't add a bunch of extra hassle or burden on you all. I really do appreciate this consideration – engendering big time good will and member appreciation with even the consideration.

I'm going to try to make sure every update going forward is tagged either 'model only'Or 'non-model'

Thanks kindly, really pleased to hear!